Australian History Truce Monitoring Group

Question: Describe about the Essay for Australian History of Truce Monitoring Group. Answer: Exercise 1: Reading Reynolds Henry, it has been noted that the main thesis of the Author is to underpin that there is a different approach in the form of genocide that took place in Tasmania and the other colonial nations. The main theme that the author wanted to propose was that why such discriminative approach has been made on the aborigines of Tasmania. A lot of comparisons have already been made on the Genocide process that took place in different parts of globe at different times. It was in the era of Hitler, when the Jews were not considered as normal humans and they were brutally killed. The aborigines of Australia were found to become violent and the British colonial thought them to be a threat for them because this group of people became very ferocious and continued to hurt the British (Reynolds, 2004, p. 128). The colonial giants found that the population of the Tasmanian Aborigines is low and killing them would be easy. However, debates have been made that Australia is an island and the population of Aborigines is quite low and that they can easily be drawn to death. In 1824, Arthur, the governor of Tasmania, arrived at the land of Tasmania with certain humanitarian policies (Reynolds, 2004, p. 132). It was one of the approaches from his end that the slaves of India were made free from the grip of the colonial power. However , the same approach was not found in case of Tasmania. In fact, an order was passed, where it was declared that the aborigines should be killed at any instance if they were found to be a threat of any kind to the British people (Reynolds, 2004, p. 135). This was the main approach that was adopted in the Martial Law. It was again justified from the end of Arthur that the complete action was taken following the instruction from higher authority. The approach was taken to save the life of the King that seemed to be in danger in case the aborigines tried to attack the King (Reynolds, 2004, p. 139). Therefore, it can be easily claimed that in order to show authority over the nation and not to degrade the status of the King, it was something needed. When the approach of Black Line was failed, Arthur was criticized and told that he was incompatible (Reynolds, 2004, p. 142). However, the violence increased from time to time and no such efforts were made to make things vulnerable and better for the residents of Australia. Exercise 2: The thesis put by the author is regarding the relationship between the military groups of Australia and New Zealand. An analysis of the approaches made by this defense staff states a lot about the relationship of the two groups of militants. The main aim of the author is to ask whether the same relationship approach existed in the recent perspective. When the world saw the ceasefire in Bougainville, the unitary approach made by the two teams of military was beyond perception. The two teams came up together and fought for their rights. The Bougainville Truce Monitoring Group (TMG) was formed with an approach to make peace with the two different groups (Baird, 2012, p. 200). The TMG at Bougainville was formed in complete support of the relationship of the two teams. At the early stage of the formation of the groups, there were differences in the opinion of the two groups. However, the differences seemed to fade away with further approaches. New Zealand showed a continuous desire for distinctiveness from Australia. In 1998, an emotional approach was found between the two countries and they came together as a united member of the team (Baird, 2012, p. 212). It has also been mentioned that even from the time of World War I, the military approaches of the two countries were completely different. Many critical views were made on the app roaches made by Australian military. The military group of New Zealand considered themselves more reliant than the other teams. Popularity of Anzac increased from time to time. The Civil war that took place in Bougainvillea felt the importance of unity and a sense of common identity among the two groups. The military forces had common peacemaking strategies (Baird, 2012, p. 219). There were certain problems regarding the interference of New Zealand in the military expedition of Australia mainly regarding the geographical context of the two regions. New Zealand was considered as an injured country in the agreement made on the collaboration of the two countries. Australia decided to carry out more formidable load of the reconstruction of Bougainville. The major difference between the military approaches of the two countries was regarding their attitude towards resourcing and using the equipment required at the time of war. There are evidences that show that the two nations had sports rivalry as well (Baird, 2012, p. 226). When the mixed team was entered in the Sports, the main aim was not to win the sort but to create a situation of trust and hope among the people. It can be easily assumed that the approaches made by the two nations were mainly due to the peace talk that took place between the two countries. There have been traces of friendly rivalry between them. In fact, it has given rise to the bitter relationship between Australian Sydney and Trent ham of New Zealand. Certain positive effects in the Pacific region have been observed as well. New Zealanders consider their ethics and culture superior to Australians. By the end of the discussion, it can be said that people Australia and New Zealand have been continuously tried to make themselves distinguished from each other. Today, the World celebrates Anzac Day to mark the collaboration and the friendly approach of the two countries. It marks the sacrifices that people had made at the time of wars. It can be assumed that there has been unity among the people and a feeling of togetherness because of the fear of departure of the troops. All such incidents provided valuable lessons of togethern ess and unity among the nations. It is believed that the TMG understands the Pacific than any other. References Baird, R. (2012). Anzac Peacekeepers: The Relationship Between Australians and New Zealanders in the Truce Monitoring Group, Bougainville. History Australia,9(3), 199-221. Reynolds, H. (2004). Genocide in Tasmania.